[jjoselson@netzero.net]

Hey Pup- Fascinating stuff. Been out of town past couple weeks, but after “binging” on this video series tonight please count me among those intrigued.

Wondering if you think the players tri approach would work by going five dogs deep, instead of 4? Would the higher hit rate, and corresponding lower net winnings, perhaps serve to smooth out the volatility curve that we’re seeing here?

I have a method that hits the top 4 dogs in quiniela about 36%, nothing special. But same method going 5 dogs deep hits 72% (decent sample of couple hundred races). I’m prepared to test it out on paper by trying to apply his dutch approach to my 5-dog deep strategy. Just curious your thoughts before I proceed with this.

[Author]

Posts